Header image
 
Natural Resource Conservation  
  

 CWC Landowner's Guide
 

 
 
Analysis:

As mentioned previously for each storm event, three samples were collected, sample bag 1, sample bag 2 and the dry bag.  The purpose of having two sample bags was to provide an average phosphorus reading for a sample area that would take into consideration variations within the sample protocol and location.  The possible influences included bugs, tree pollen and other natural effects.  The following comparison graphs show the concentrations Bag 1 and Bag 2 per sampling location.

 

Analysis graphGraph 1
Analysis graphGraph 2

Analysis graphGraph 3
Analysis graphGraph 4

The purpose of having the dry bag was to collect local atmospheric deposition and to use that phosphorus value as a control blank.  Prior to the placement of any collection bags a field control analysis was conducted on the bags to rule out the addition of any phosphorus from initial bag contamination.  Based on the average analysis of the dry bags each sample location was ranked for local atmospheric deposition.  The following table provides that ranking per location.

Location

Average Dry Bag

Rank

30 lakes

0.275

1

Shell Rock Bartusek House

0.081

2

Red Lake

0.055

3

Shell Rock Court House

0.036

4

Table 6

Analysis of the data, including the HYSPLIT graphs and GIS tracking, further solidified the hypothesis that the increase seen in phosphorus levels were coming from atmospheric loading.  To determine exactly where geographically the loading was coming from, the GIS tracking data was modified to show when the storm event air mass was at or below 500 meters during the 120 hour backwards trajectory.  Statistical analysis of the storm event elevations versus the total phosphorus concentrations revealed a high correlation. Basically indicating that the lower the elevation of the storm event, the higher the total phosphorus concentration was for the overall storm event.  Correlation coefficients for both the extreme and low loadings were determined for all three Watershed Districts. Some data points were omitted because of they did not represent the commonality of the rest of the data. There are two correlation graphs shown per location. The first correlation graph shows all extreme and low data points. The second is a correlation graph with the omitted data points. The following image shows the storm event track of the omitted data along with image maps showing areas where the air mass was at or below the 500 meters (indicated in red) and the areas that the air mass remained greater than 500 meters (indicated in shades of purple) for both the extreme and high precipitation events. 

30 Lakes
Correlation                                          Graph 5
Omitted Correlation                            Graph 6
Omitted tracking                                 Image 114
Extreme events                                   Image 115
High events                                         Image 116

Red Lakes
Correlation                                          Graph 7
Omitted Correlation                            NA
Omitted tracking                                 NA
Extreme events                                   Image 117
High events                                         Image 118

 

Shell Rock Court House
Correlation                                          Graph 8
Omitted Correlation                            NA
Omitted tracking                                 NA
Extreme events                                   NA
High events                                         Image 119

Shell Rock Bartusek House
Correlation                                          Graph 9
Omitted Correlation                            Graph 10
Omitted tracking                                 Image 120
Extreme events                                   Image 121
High events                                         Image 122

 

 

 

 

 

30 Lakes Correlation
Analysis graphAnalysis graphAnalysis graphAnalysis graphAnalysis graph


Correlation Coefficient

-0.67625

Red circles indicate the omitted values on the next graph
Graph 5

30 Lakes Correlation – Omitted Values
Analysis graph


Correlation Coefficient

-0.87968

Graph 6
30 Lakes Correlation – Omitted Values Tracking
Analysis graph
Image 114
30 Lakes Extreme
Analysis graph
Image 115

 

30 Lakes High
Analysis graph
Image 116

 

 

Red Lake Correlation
Analysis graph


Correlation Coefficient

-1

Graph 7

 

Red Lake Extreme
Analysis graph
Image 117

 

Red Lake High
Analysis graph
Image 118

 

 

Shell Rock Court House Correlation
Analysis graph
Not enough data to run a correlation
Graph 8

Shell Rock Court House High
Analysis graph
Image 119
Shell Rock Bartusek House Correlation
Analysis graphAnalysis graph


Correlation Coefficient

-0.67335

Red circles indicate the omitted values on the next graph
Graph 9

Shell Rock Bartusek House Correlation – Omitted Values
Analysis graph


Correlation Coefficient

-0.71995

Graph 10
Shell Rock Bartusek House Correlation – Omitted Values Tracking
Analysis graph
Image 120
Shell Rock Bartusek House Extreme
Analysis graph
Image 121

 

Shell Rock Bartusek House High
Analysis graph
Image 122

 

To make it easier to identify, the air masses less than 500 m, were mapped and all other elevations were eliminated.  This data was then mapped out by sampling location as shown by the in the images below.

 

 

30 Lakes
Analysis graph
Image 123

Red Lake
Analysis graph
Image 124

Shell Rock Court House
Analysis graph
Image 125

Shell Rock Bartusek House
Analysis graph
Image 126

 
 Home Aerial Photos District Map Contact Us Managers ProjectsLinks Background Stormwater Permit What's New Kid's Page

 
EditRegion11
 
 

Meetings held every
2nd Monday at 9:00 am
CWC Land Services Building
322 Laurel Street
Meeting Room downstairs

 

   

Thirty Lakes Watershed District
322 Laurel Street, Suite 13
Brainerd, MN 56401
Phone: 218-828-0243
email: lakeswsd@brainerd.net